RFA: 8044235: src.zip should include all sources

Severin Gehwolf sgehwolf at redhat.com
Thu Sep 27 12:20:56 UTC 2018


Hi Sean,

On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 12:42 +0100, Seán Coffey wrote:
> Severin,
> 
> this is an enhancement and as such should be accompanied by an 
> enhancement backport approval template :
> 
> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/enhancement-template.html
> 
> I've long been a fan of bringing this back to jdk8u-dev also. This one 
> is currently in review. In the interim, please log an enhancement 
> request so that we can track such requests.

Thanks, done:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-September/007919.html

Cheers,
Severin

> regards,
> Sean.
> 
> 
> On 26/09/2018 17:43, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Please approve this backport request for 8044235 so as to include all
> > sources in src.zip produced by the build. It will only include all
> > sources when OPENJDK is defined. So it should be OK for Oracle JDK
> > builds.
> > 
> > I should mention that this increases the size of src.zip from about
> > 25MB to 50MB. With that being said, src.zip is supposed to help Java
> > developers stepping through their code. Randomly omitting sources for
> > some classes while including others does not make a lot of sense.
> > OpenJDK is *open source* after all. We are in 2018 (do those extra 25MB
> > really matter?). Downstream consumers can remove src.zip from their
> > bundle if they're concerned about size. In Fedora, we have been using
> > this patch for years. There, src.zip is in a separate package so not
> > everybody gets it by default. Problem solved :)
> > 
> > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8044235
> > 
> > Patch is the same as for JDK 9:
> > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/5cab03c4e5f9
> > 
> > Original review thread is here:
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2014-May/000785.html
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Severin
> > 
> 
> 



More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list