Code generation patches for fuzzer (feedback requested)

[Hannes Wallnoefer]

Thanks, could have figured that out on my own :)

Hannes

Am 2013-10-15 17:14, schrieb André Bargull:
> Already done --> 
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html#b  :-D
>
>
> On 10/15/2013 5:12 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
>> Sorry if this was asked before, but did you sign the OpenJDK 
>> contributor agreement? Would you mind doing so?
>>
>> http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
>>
>> That is required to adopt your patches.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hannes
>>
>> Am 2013-10-15 16:59, schrieb André Bargull:
>>> (Your answer was only sent to the mailing list and I'm using digest 
>>> mode, that means I get your responses with delay... )
>>>
>>> Sure, I understand the scheduling issues. If the changes are too 
>>> risky or if there isn't even enough time to perform risk evaluation, 
>>> they won't make it for JDK8. But posting the patches won't hurt, 
>>> will it? :-)
>>>
>>> - André
>>>
>>>
>>>> As we are approaching towards jdk8 end game, it is better to avoid
>>>> sweeping changes at the last minute.
>>>>
>>>> I think we can definitely consider these changes for post jdk8 (8 
>>>> update
>>>> perhaps..).
>>>>
>>>> PS. As you know, not all your previous 'fuzzer' issues have been fixed
>>>> for jdk8 - again due to time constraints.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for reporting,
>>>> -Sundar
>>
>>
>