[security-dev 00602]: Re: code review request: 5067458 Loopback SSLSocketImpl createSocket is throwing an exception.

Xuelei Fan Xuelei.Fan at Sun.COM
Mon Feb 23 05:46:05 UTC 2009


Max (Weijun) Wang wrote:
> Fix looks fine.
>
> BTW, SSLSocketFactory has another method
>
>            createSocket(Socket s, String host,
>                   int port, boolean autoClose)
>
> How does it behave?
Because there is a "Socket" parameter, so no new connection will be 
established. The "host" parameter will only be used for hostname checking.
> and, will you clarify its javadoc on the host argument?
>
The jdk 7 has already updated the javadoc[1], which looks like:

     * @param host the server host name with which to connect, or
     *        <code>null</code> for the loopback address.

[1]: src/share/classes/javax/net/SocketFactory.java

Thanks,
Andrew
> Max
>
>
> On Feb 23, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>
>> I need to get a code review for:
>>   5067458 Loopback SSLSocketImpl createSocket is throwing an exception.
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/5067458/webrev.00/ 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Exuelei/5067458/webrev.00/>
>>
>> The  bug description:
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> i'm attaching an example. in essence, i do this:
>>
>>           SocketFactory f = SocketFactory.getDefault();
>>           Socket s = f.createSocket( (String)null, 8080 );
>>
>> and i create a loopback socket, as per the spec for java.net.Socket.
>> the createSocket() call throws an exception, but it's an
>> IOException which indicates "Connection refused" because i don't
>> have anything listening on that socket. no problem there. however,
>> then i do this:
>>
>>           SSLSocketFactory f =
>>       (SSLSocketFactory)SSLSocketFactory.getDefault();
>>           SSLSocket s = (SSLSocket)f.createSocket( (String)null,
>>                                                    8080 );
>>
>> and i get an IllegalArgumentException from java.net.InetSocketAddress
>> saying that an InetSocketAddress can't be created with a null
>> hostname. since SSLSocket extends socket, and the spec doesn't
>> mention any change in behavior, i would expect to get the same
>> loopback behavior and another "Connection refused" exception.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Xuelei
>




More information about the security-dev mailing list