[8] Request for review: 8005414: Removing fix for JDK-6500133

[Jason Uh]

Thanks for your suggestions. I suppose there's no reason to restore the 
old test, so here's an updated webrev with my test adjusted for the new 
expected behavior:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/8005414/webrev.01/

Thanks,
Jason

On 01/14/2013 02:29 PM, Jason Uh wrote:
> There used to be a unit test in the closed workspace for this case that
> was removed when the fix for 6500133 was introduced.
>
> That test and its certificate will be restored.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
> On 01/14/2013 02:18 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> On 01/14/2013 05:00 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>>> Am 14.01.2013, 22:52 Uhr, schrieb Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com>:
>>>
>>>> Looks good to me.
>>>
>>> The patch removes all unit tests for this class it seems. There
>>> should be
>>> one parseable URL and if you intent to reject illegal content you can
>>> use
>>> the test vectors to test for the expected exception.
>>
>> Good point. Jason, can you keep the test but readjust to test for an
>> expected exception?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sean