[8] Request for review: 8005414: Removing fix for JDK-6500133

[Jason Uh]

Sorry, please refer to the following webrev instead: 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/8005414/webrev.02/ (Removed @bug tag as 
this is no longer fixing 6500133).

On 01/14/2013 03:41 PM, Jason Uh wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestions. I suppose there's no reason to restore the
> old test, so here's an updated webrev with my test adjusted for the new
> expected behavior:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/8005414/webrev.01/
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
> On 01/14/2013 02:29 PM, Jason Uh wrote:
>> There used to be a unit test in the closed workspace for this case that
>> was removed when the fix for 6500133 was introduced.
>>
>> That test and its certificate will be restored.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jason
>>
>> On 01/14/2013 02:18 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
>>> On 01/14/2013 05:00 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>>>> Am 14.01.2013, 22:52 Uhr, schrieb Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Looks good to me.
>>>>
>>>> The patch removes all unit tests for this class it seems. There
>>>> should be
>>>> one parseable URL and if you intent to reject illegal content you can
>>>> use
>>>> the test vectors to test for the expected exception.
>>>
>>> Good point. Jason, can you keep the test but readjust to test for an
>>> expected exception?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sean