Code review request [JDK 9] 8042449 Issue for negative byte major record version
Florian Weimer
fweimer at redhat.com
Tue May 6 13:31:58 UTC 2014
On 05/06/2014 02:00 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
> Storing both int version and major/minor byte versions is a little bit
> redundancy. The update is significant. I will focus on the signed byte
> issue in this fix.
Yes, I get that. I've verified that you've covered all the version
comparisons.
I was just wondering if accessor methods (or storing the values as ints)
would make it less likely that the issue reoccurs in a different
variant. But the new checkRecordVersion() probably covers that.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
More information about the security-dev
mailing list