Code review request [JDK 9] 8042449 Issue for negative byte major record version
Xuelei Fan
xuelei.fan at oracle.com
Tue May 6 13:37:56 UTC 2014
On 5/6/2014 9:31 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 05/06/2014 02:00 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>
>> Storing both int version and major/minor byte versions is a little bit
>> redundancy. The update is significant. I will focus on the signed byte
>> issue in this fix.
>
> Yes, I get that. I've verified that you've covered all the version
> comparisons.
>
Thanks for the code review. Do you have a OpenJDK author account?
> I was just wondering if accessor methods (or storing the values as ints)
> would make it less likely that the issue reoccurs in a different
> variant.
I think, it should be better.
Thanks,
Xuelei
> But the new checkRecordVersion() probably covers that.
>
More information about the security-dev
mailing list