Fwd: Issue JDK-8048194 backport in jdk9 ?

Koen Serry ks at trustbuilder.be
Tue Sep 30 06:56:41 UTC 2014


Hi,

could anyone merge the code of jdk9 into jdk8 as supposedly done in the 
ticket.
I see the code in jdk9 forest, not in the jdk8 forest.

kind regards,
Koen Serry

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	RE: Issue JDK-8048194 backport in jdk9 ?
Date: 	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:17:13 -0700
From: 	Iris Clark <iris.clark at oracle.com>
To: 	Koen Serry <ks at trustbuilder.be>, <help at openjdk.java.net>



Hi, Koen.

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048194

 From my read of bug JDK-8048194, it appears that the bug was fixed in JDK 9 only.  I base this on the "Fix Version/s" value of "9", and the "Activity", "Comments" at 2014-07-21 18:31 showing the fix got pushed to the jdk9/dev forest, and the 2014-07-30 12:25 showing the fix pushed to the jdk9/jdk9 forest.  I don't see any indication that the fix was backported to JDK 8 update, so I don't think it should be in JDK 8 u40.

Since the bug has a "Component" of "security-libs", I recommend that you send e-mail to security-dev [1] where you'll find the bug's current owner and other experts in the area.  They'll be able to provide you with definitive answers.

Thanks,
Iris Clark

-----Original Message-----
From: Koen Serry [mailto:ks at trustbuilder.be]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 1:41 AM
To:help at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Issue JDK-8048194 backport in jdk9 ?

Hi,

I don't know if someone will get my email, but anyway here goes nothing.

I've stumbled upon this bug with jdk7 :
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048194
and since any reason was as good for upgrading to jdk8 as this. I though about upgrading as it would fix this issue.

However, even though it says it's been fixed in jdk8 (u9), if I test it in the oracle provided jdk8u40b06 I still have the issue.

The strange thing is that the commit only happened in the jdk9 forest, so am I getting this wrong or should I be building from the source?

Thank you so much if someone could shed some light on this.

Koen Serry
@koen_serry







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20140930/1648db22/attachment.htm>


More information about the security-dev mailing list