Fwd: Issue JDK-8048194 backport in jdk9 ?

Seán Coffey sean.coffey at oracle.com
Tue Sep 30 16:05:26 UTC 2014


Iris is correct. This fix is in JDK 9 only. I'm not sure why you think 
it's fixed in jdk8u.

Max - are you willing to pull this fix into the JDK 8u code line or 
shall I ?

regards,
Sean.

On 30/09/2014 07:56, Koen Serry wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> could anyone merge the code of jdk9 into jdk8 as supposedly done in 
> the ticket.
> I see the code in jdk9 forest, not in the jdk8 forest.
>
> kind regards,
> Koen Serry
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	RE: Issue JDK-8048194 backport in jdk9 ?
> Date: 	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:17:13 -0700
> From: 	Iris Clark <iris.clark at oracle.com>
> To: 	Koen Serry <ks at trustbuilder.be>, <help at openjdk.java.net>
>
>
>
> Hi, Koen.
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048194
>
>  From my read of bug JDK-8048194, it appears that the bug was fixed in JDK 9 only.  I base this on the "Fix Version/s" value of "9", and the "Activity", "Comments" at 2014-07-21 18:31 showing the fix got pushed to the jdk9/dev forest, and the 2014-07-30 12:25 showing the fix pushed to the jdk9/jdk9 forest.  I don't see any indication that the fix was backported to JDK 8 update, so I don't think it should be in JDK 8 u40.
>
> Since the bug has a "Component" of "security-libs", I recommend that you send e-mail to security-dev [1] where you'll find the bug's current owner and other experts in the area.  They'll be able to provide you with definitive answers.
>
> Thanks,
> Iris Clark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Koen Serry [mailto:ks at trustbuilder.be]
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 1:41 AM
> To:help at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Issue JDK-8048194 backport in jdk9 ?
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if someone will get my email, but anyway here goes nothing.
>
> I've stumbled upon this bug with jdk7 :
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048194
> and since any reason was as good for upgrading to jdk8 as this. I though about upgrading as it would fix this issue.
>
> However, even though it says it's been fixed in jdk8 (u9), if I test it in the oracle provided jdk8u40b06 I still have the issue.
>
> The strange thing is that the commit only happened in the jdk9 forest, so am I getting this wrong or should I be building from the source?
>
> Thank you so much if someone could shed some light on this.
>
> Koen Serry
> @koen_serry
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20140930/ece6b985/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the security-dev mailing list