RFR 8027781: New jarsigner timestamp warning is grammatically incorrect

[Wang Weijun]

Hi Sean

Please review a resource string change

diff --git a/src/jdk.jartool/share/classes/sun/security/tools/jarsigner/Resources.java b/src/jdk.jartool/share/classes/sun/security/tools/jarsigner/Resources.java
--- a/src/jdk.jartool/share/classes/sun/security/tools/jarsigner/Resources.java
+++ b/src/jdk.jartool/share/classes/sun/security/tools/jarsigner/Resources.java
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@
         {"no.timestamp.signing",
                 "No -tsa or -tsacert is provided and this jar is not timestamped. Without a timestamp, users may not be able to validate this jar after the signer certificate's expiration date (%1$tY-%1$tm-%1$td)."},
         {"no.timestamp.verifying",
-                "This jar contains signatures that does not include a timestamp. Without a timestamp, users may not be able to validate this jar after the signer certificate's expiration date (%1$tY-%1$tm-%1$td)."},
+                "This jar contains signatures that do not include a timestamp. Without a timestamp, users may not be able to validate this jar after any of the signer certificates expires (as early as %1$tY-%1$tm-%1$td)."},
         {"Unknown.password.type.", "Unknown password type: "},
         {"Cannot.find.environment.variable.",
                 "Cannot find environment variable: "},

I haven't used "one or more signatures" because many other jarsigner warnings use "This jar contains entries..." which do not have the words.

About the expiration date, the warning is already showing the earliest one, so I added "as early as".

Please note that when signing, the warning always shows the expiration date of the signer, even if there are other existing signatures without a timestamp.

I assume this is a bug fix and no CCC is needed. Right?

Thanks
Max