RFR 8158589: Possible integer overflow issues for DRBG

[Wang Weijun]

Ping again.

> On Jun 7, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Wang Weijun <weijun.wang at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi All
> 
> Please take a review at
> 
>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8158589/webrev.00/
> 
> For the reseedCounter case, the default reseedInterval is Integer.MAX_VALUE and there is no integer bigger than it, therefore a new check reseedCounter < 0 is added. I had thought about making it long but can a long field be a safe volatile? I am not sure.
> 
> I added a label noreg-cleanup, or maybe noreg-hard is better?
> 
> Thanks
> Max
>