RFR: 8157561 :Ship the unlimited policy files in JDK Updates

[Seán Coffey]

Thanks for review Brad. I've included an extra check in CryptoLevel to 
check for "limited/unlimited" input. Addressed the JceSecurity 
indentation issue also.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.8157561.8u.jdk.v5/webrev/

Regards,
Sean.

On 04/11/16 22:56, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
> I didn't see anything majorly different in what I looked at earlier, I 
> didn't check java.security or the test case.
>
>
> CryptoLevel.java
> ================
> 49: Your usage mentions only unlimited|limited.  Do you want to 
> include a check for that?
>
> JceSecurity.java
> ================
> 300:  Indention problem.
>
> Looks ok otherwise.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brad
>
>
>
>
> On 11/4/2016 7:16 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Build changes look ok to me.
>>
>> /Erik
>>
>>
>> On 2016-11-04 14:42, Seán Coffey wrote:
>>> Looking to push this enhancement to jdk8u. The change introduces the
>>> new Security property which was brought into JDK 9 via JDK-8061842.
>>>
>>> The code differs in that jar files continue to be used and backwards
>>> compatibility is maintained. If the new security property is not
>>> defined and the policy jar files exist in the legacy locations, then
>>> those jar files will continue to be honoured.
>>>
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157561
>>> webrev :
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.8157561.8u.jdk.v4/webrev/
>>>
>>