Antwort: Re: Support for ECParameters with explicit (not named) parameter spec
Max Fichtelmann
Max.Fichtelmann at procilon.de
Wed Dec 6 16:39:38 UTC 2017
We use a HSM to generate ECDSA Keys and are required to use the curve
brainpoolP256r1.
Although the HSM does not specifically support brainpool, it is possible
to generate these keys by providing the specific Curve Parameters. These
curve parameters are then saved in CKA_EC_PARAMS - the PKCS11 Object for
the public key looks like this (several attributes omitted):
CKA_CLASS CKO_PUBLIC_KEY
CKA_TOKEN true
CKA_PRIVATE false
CKA_KEY_TYPE CKK_EC
CKA_ID length 20
{ 06223B39 9F887A9D CA547DAD 3E1CC1DD 675D6D1E }
CKA_KEY_GEN_MECHANISM CKM_EC_KEY_PAIR_GEN
CKA_EC_PARAMS length 227 (1816 bits)
{ 0x30, 0x81, 0xE0, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01, 0x30, 0x2C, 0x06, 0x07, 0x2A,
0x86,
0x48, 0xCE, 0x3D, 0x01, 0x01, 0x02, 0x21, 0x00, 0xA9, 0xFB, 0x57,
0xDB,
0xA1, 0xEE, 0xA9, 0xBC, 0x3E, 0x66, 0x0A, 0x90, 0x9D, 0x83, 0x8D,
0x72,
0x6E, 0x3B, 0xF6, 0x23, 0xD5, 0x26, 0x20, 0x28, 0x20, 0x13, 0x48,
0x1D,
0x1F, 0x6E, 0x53, 0x77, 0x30, 0x44, 0x04, 0x20, 0x7D, 0x5A, 0x09,
0x75,
0xFC, 0x2C, 0x30, 0x57, 0xEE, 0xF6, 0x75, 0x30, 0x41, 0x7A, 0xFF,
0xE7,
0xFB, 0x80, 0x55, 0xC1, 0x26, 0xDC, 0x5C, 0x6C, 0xE9, 0x4A, 0x4B,
0x44,
0xF3, 0x30, 0xB5, 0xD9, 0x04, 0x20, 0x26, 0xDC, 0x5C, 0x6C, 0xE9,
0x4A,
0x4B, 0x44, 0xF3, 0x30, 0xB5, 0xD9, 0xBB, 0xD7, 0x7C, 0xBF, 0x95,
0x84,
0x16, 0x29, 0x5C, 0xF7, 0xE1, 0xCE, 0x6B, 0xCC, 0xDC, 0x18, 0xFF,
0x8C,
0x07, 0xB6, 0x04, 0x41, 0x04, 0x8B, 0xD2, 0xAE, 0xB9, 0xCB, 0x7E,
0x57,
0xCB, 0x2C, 0x4B, 0x48, 0x2F, 0xFC, 0x81, 0xB7, 0xAF, 0xB9, 0xDE,
0x27,
0xE1, 0xE3, 0xBD, 0x23, 0xC2, 0x3A, 0x44, 0x53, 0xBD, 0x9A, 0xCE,
0x32,
0x62, 0x54, 0x7E, 0xF8, 0x35, 0xC3, 0xDA, 0xC4, 0xFD, 0x97, 0xF8,
0x46,
0x1A, 0x14, 0x61, 0x1D, 0xC9, 0xC2, 0x77, 0x45, 0x13, 0x2D, 0xED,
0x8E,
0x54, 0x5C, 0x1D, 0x54, 0xC7, 0x2F, 0x04, 0x69, 0x97, 0x02, 0x21,
0x00,
0xA9, 0xFB, 0x57, 0xDB, 0xA1, 0xEE, 0xA9, 0xBC, 0x3E, 0x66, 0x0A,
0x90,
0x9D, 0x83, 0x8D, 0x71, 0x8C, 0x39, 0x7A, 0xA3, 0xB5, 0x61, 0xA6,
0xF7,
0x90, 0x1E, 0x0E, 0x82, 0x97, 0x48, 0x56, 0xA7, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01 }
CKA_EC_POINT length 67 (536 bits)
{ 0x04, 0x41, 0x04, 0x05, 0x2C, 0x86, 0x09, 0x68, 0x17, 0x6E, 0x8D,
0x13,
0xE8, 0xE8, 0x0E, 0x74, 0x08, 0x42, 0xBF, 0xD6, 0xFE, 0xE2, 0x8A,
0xBB,
0x74, 0xC7, 0x0A, 0x6E, 0x8A, 0x10, 0x8A, 0x4E, 0x78, 0xA0, 0xDD,
0x14,
0xC2, 0x82, 0x9D, 0xF5, 0xB0, 0x65, 0xF4, 0x94, 0xB4, 0xDF, 0x3E,
0x13,
0xF9, 0x44, 0x96, 0x9F, 0x66, 0x3B, 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x87, 0xE7, 0xC8,
0x69,
0x29, 0x57, 0xD0, 0x68, 0xE4, 0x2A, 0x2A }
When using SunPKCS11 to load the KeyPair, ECParams is used with the value
of CKA_EC_PARAMS which then fails.
So there are not many options I see - either patching JDK or getting the
HSM-Vendor to add support for brainpool...
Thank you very much for the swift reply and the contribution link.
Von: Xuelei Fan <xuelei.fan at oracle.com>
An: Max Fichtelmann <Max.Fichtelmann at procilon.de>,
security-dev at openjdk.java.net
Datum: 06/12/2017 16:52
Betreff: Re: Support for ECParameters with explicit (not named)
parameter spec
On 12/6/2017 4:24 AM, Max Fichtelmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> currently sun.security.util.ECParameters.engineInit(byte[]) is limited
> to parse named curves. A commented block outlining parsing of explicit
> parameters is included below throwing "only named ECParameters
> supported". That comment block seems to be unchanged from at least jdk6
> up until jdk10.
>
What's the requirement for unnamed parameter spec? For TLS or just basic
crypto operation? Would you mind have an example about the use of it?
> Is there any Plan to implement this at some time? Since I am needing to
> implement it anyway, how could I provide that change?
>
Please refer to the "How to contribute" doc in OpenJDK:
http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
Regards,
Xuelei
> Kind Regards,
>
> Max Fichtelmann
>
>
>
> *procilon IT-Logistics GmbH*
> Leipziger Straße 110
> 04425 Taucha bei Leipzig
> www.procilon.de
> <
https://www.procilon.de?utm_source=email&utm_medium=mail_disclaimer&utm_campaign=mail_disclaimer_proTECTr-app_1215
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> procilon IT-Systems GmbH & Co. KG
> Amtsgericht Leipzig HRA 16016
> Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin:
> procentauri Beteiligungs- und Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH
> Geschäftsführer Steffen Scholz, Amtsgericht Leipzig, Handelsregister HRB
> 25771
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige
> vertrauliche Informationen enthalten.
> Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine
> Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts,
> eine Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdrücklich untersagt.
> Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail.
> Vielen Dank.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or
> otherwise confidential information.
> If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that
> any review,
> copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited.
> Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank
> you for your cooperation.
procilon IT-Systems GmbH & Co. KG
Leipziger Straße 110
04425 Taucha bei Leipzig
www.procilon.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
procilon IT-Systems GmbH & Co. KG
Amtsgericht Leipzig HRA 16016
Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin:
procentauri Beteiligungs- und Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH
Geschäftsführer Steffen Scholz, Amtsgericht Leipzig, Handelsregister HRB 25771
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten.
Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts,
eine Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdrücklich untersagt.
Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information.
If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review,
copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited.
Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20171206/956167f9/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1967 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20171206/956167f9/smime.p7s>
More information about the security-dev
mailing list