about JDK-8186628
Ivan Gerasimov
ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com
Fri Apr 20 17:45:52 UTC 2018
I'll go ahead with a review of the enhancement request JDK-8202086
shortly on this list.
And we'll still need to decide what has to be done in the earlier
releases of JDK.
With kind regards,
Ivan
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202086>
On 4/20/18 10:06 AM, nezih yigitbasi wrote:
> Ivan, thanks for the information. Any ideas about when one of these
> solutions can be released?
>
> Nezih
>
> 2018-04-20 9:22 GMT-07:00 Ivan Gerasimov <ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com
> <mailto:ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com>>:
>
> Hello Nezih!
>
> This issue is still being discussed off-list.
> There have been two approaches proposed so far: 1) improve the
> session cache and 2) provide an option to turn the cache off
> completely.
>
> The former one is good by itself, so I filed an enhancement
> request [1] with a link to proposal made by Peter Levart [2].
> However, as this is an enhancement, it seems unlikely it's going
> to be backported to earlier releases of JDK.
>
> With kind regards,
> Ivan
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202086
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202086>
> [2]
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2017-November/016512.html
> <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2017-November/016512.html>
>
>
> On 4/18/18 9:32 PM, nezih yigitbasi wrote:
>> Hi,
>> We are hitting the scalability problem of the SSL session cache
>> in production that JDK-8186628 is addressing.
>> I see that JDK-8186628 has not been updated since Nov'17, so I
>> just wanted to get information about what the current plans are
>> regarding that issue.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nezih
>
> --
> With kind regards,
> Ivan Gerasimov
>
>
--
With kind regards,
Ivan Gerasimov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20180420/52cdaf7b/attachment.htm>
More information about the security-dev
mailing list