[CAUTION] RFR [XS]: 8237869: exclude jtreg test security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA.java because of instabilities - was : RE: jtreg test security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrus

Sean Mullan sean.mullan at oracle.com
Mon Jan 27 15:31:37 UTC 2020


On 1/27/20 10:29 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
> On 1/27/20 8:41 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> the entry in ProblemList.txt can't refer to 8237869, which is the bug 
>> that you're using to submit the exclusion. It must refer to the item 
>> that shall resolve the underlying issue which probably is Oracle's 
>> private bug that Sean referred to.
> Right.
> 
>>
>> @Sean: In the interest of backportability, I'd ask you to either open 
>> up the internal bug and supply its id. If that isn't possible, could 
>> you please create a new public item and have your internal bug refer 
>> to it?
> 
> I can't open it up because it contains internal network addresses. Even 
> if I scrub them out, I believe you could still see them in the History.
> 
> I would suggest that Matthias open a new public bug to track this issue 
> using the information in the Description of JDK-8237869, and I will then 
> mark 8237869 as a duplicate. 

Sorry, I meant to say I will mark the internal bug as a duplicate.

--Sean

> You can assign that bug to me for now. Most 
> likely it is an issue that LuxTrust has to fix on their end, and once 
> that is fixed we can simply remove it from the ProblemList.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sean
> 
>>
>> Thanks
>> Christoph
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: security-dev <security-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of
>>> Baesken, Matthias
>>> Sent: Montag, 27. Januar 2020 10:25
>>> To: Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com>; security-
>>> dev at openjdk.java.net
>>> Subject: [CAUTION] RFR [XS]: 8237869: exclude jtreg test
>>> security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA. 
>>>
>>> java because of instabilities - was : RE: jtreg test
>>> security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrust... 
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello, please review the exclusion of  jtreg test
>>> security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA. 
>>>
>>> java  .
>>>
>>> Bug/webrev :
>>>
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8237869
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8237869.0/
>>>
>>> Thanks, Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com>
>>>> Sent: Freitag, 24. Januar 2020 21:11
>>>> To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baesken at sap.com>; security-
>>>> dev at openjdk.java.net
>>>> Subject: Re: jtreg test
>>>>
>>> security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA. 
>>>
>>>> java instabilities
>>>>
>>>> On 1/24/20 3:40 AM, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
>>>>> Hi Sean, thanks for looking into it .
>>>>>
>>>>>> However, there is no nextUpdate field set, which means there should
>>> be
>>>> always newer information available. So while the 5 minute delay may not
>>> be
>>>> a huge issue, the fact that they are returning cached responses,
>>>>>
>>>>>> looks like a problem to me.This could be the underlying problem, 
>>>>>> in that
>>>> they are not generating fresh OCSPResponses. I will contact LuxTrust 
>>>> and
>>> see
>>>> if we can get some information from them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we exclude  the test  until  the issue is resolved ?
>>>>
>>>> Ok, that is fine with me.
>>>>
>>


More information about the security-dev mailing list