[CAUTION] RFR [XS]: 8237869: exclude jtreg test security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA.java because of instabilities - was : RE: jtreg test security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrus

[Sean Mullan]

Looks fine to me.

--Sean

On 1/27/20 11:10 AM, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
> Hi,  new webrev , now with the other bugid :
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8237869.1/
>
>
>
>   ... and  new  issue to track the LuxTrust instabilities :
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8237888
> security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA.java fails when checking validity interval
>
>
> Best regards, Matthias
>
>
>> On 1/27/20 8:41 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> the entry in ProblemList.txt can't refer to 8237869, which is the bug that
>> you're using to submit the exclusion. It must refer to the item that shall
>> resolve the underlying issue which probably is Oracle's private bug that Sean
>> referred to.
>> Right.
>>
>>> @Sean: In the interest of backportability, I'd ask you to either open up the
>> internal bug and supply its id. If that isn't possible, could you please create a
>> new public item and have your internal bug refer to it?
>>
>> I can't open it up because it contains internal network addresses. Even
>> if I scrub them out, I believe you could still see them in the History.
>>
>> I would suggest that Matthias open a new public bug to track this issue
>> using the information in the Description of JDK-8237869, and I will then
>> mark 8237869 as a duplicate. You can assign that bug to me for now. Most
>> likely it is an issue that LuxTrust has to fix on their end, and once
>> that is fixed we can simply remove it from the ProblemList.
>>
>> Thanks,