[CAUTION] RFR [XS]: 8237869: exclude jtreg test security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA.java because of instabilities - was : RE: jtreg test security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrus

[Langer, Christoph]

+1

I converted JDK-8237869 to be a subtask of JDK-8237888.

@Sean: I couldn't assign it to you but I assume you'll pick it yourself and add do the necessary updates. Thanks.

Best regards
Christoph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Mullan <sean.mullan at oracle.com>
> Sent: Montag, 27. Januar 2020 17:13
> To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baesken at sap.com>; Langer, Christoph
> <christoph.langer at sap.com>; security-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: [CAUTION] RFR [XS]: 8237869: exclude jtreg test
> security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA.
> java because of instabilities - was : RE: jtreg test
> security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrus
> 
> Looks fine to me.
> 
> --Sean
> 
> On 1/27/20 11:10 AM, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
> > Hi,  new webrev , now with the other bugid :
> >
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8237869.1/
> >
> >
> >
> >   ... and  new  issue to track the LuxTrust instabilities :
> >
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8237888
> >
> security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA.
> java fails when checking validity interval
> >
> >
> > Best regards, Matthias
> >
> >
> >> On 1/27/20 8:41 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> >>> Hi Matthias,
> >>>
> >>> the entry in ProblemList.txt can't refer to 8237869, which is the bug that
> >> you're using to submit the exclusion. It must refer to the item that shall
> >> resolve the underlying issue which probably is Oracle's private bug that
> Sean
> >> referred to.
> >> Right.
> >>
> >>> @Sean: In the interest of backportability, I'd ask you to either open up
> the
> >> internal bug and supply its id. If that isn't possible, could you please create
> a
> >> new public item and have your internal bug refer to it?
> >>
> >> I can't open it up because it contains internal network addresses. Even
> >> if I scrub them out, I believe you could still see them in the History.
> >>
> >> I would suggest that Matthias open a new public bug to track this issue
> >> using the information in the Description of JDK-8237869, and I will then
> >> mark 8237869 as a duplicate. You can assign that bug to me for now. Most
> >> likely it is an issue that LuxTrust has to fix on their end, and once
> >> that is fixed we can simply remove it from the ProblemList.
> >>
> >> Thanks,