RFR: 8331008: Implement JEP 478: Key Derivation Function API (Preview) [v10]

Kevin Driver kdriver at openjdk.org
Tue Aug 13 14:34:57 UTC 2024


On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 21:37:23 GMT, Valerie Peng <valeriep at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Kevin Driver has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 16 additional commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - update test to include Spi updates
>>  - Update with latest from master
>>    
>>    Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into kdf-jep-wip
>>    # Please enter a commit message to explain why this merge is necessary,
>>    # especially if it merges an updated upstream into a topic branch.
>>    #
>>    # Lines starting with '#' will be ignored, and an empty message aborts
>>    # the commit.
>>  - add engineGetKDFParameters to the KDFSpi
>>  - code review comment fix for javadoc specification
>>  - change course on null return values from derive methods
>>  - code review comments
>>  - threading refactor + code review comments
>>  - review comments
>>  - review comments
>>  - update code snippet type in KDF
>>  - ... and 6 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/b0ba5cfc...dd2ee48f
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/crypto/KDF.java line 52:
> 
>> 50:  * of methods. For <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5869">RFC 5869</a>,
>> 51:  * KDF algorithm names follow a naming convention of
>> 52:  * <em>Algorithm</em>With<em>PRF</em>. For instance, a KDF implementation of
> 
> I only see HKDF mentioned in RFC 5869. There is no naming convention of <Algorithm>With<PRF> anywhere. Is there any other spec/standard or crypto libraries using this naming?

@valeriepeng: There are `Cipher`s with this convention, namely: `PBEWithHmacSHA512/256AndAES_256` and many others. In addition, there are corresponding `AlgorithmParameters` and `SecretKeyFactory` declarations.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20301#discussion_r1715406664



More information about the security-dev mailing list