RFR: 8315487: Security Providers Filter [v9]

[Sean Mullan]

So you are saying that the JEP (#15539) has to be integrated first, then 
JDK-8345139? If that's the case, shouldn't the JBS block links be the 
other way around?

--Sean

On 11/29/24 2:25 PM, Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet wrote:
> Unlike [JDK-8345221](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345221 "Replace legacy with new Provider APIs in SunNativeGSS"), [JDK-8345139](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345139 "Fix bugs and inconsistencies in the Provider services map") will be a dependency for this pull request. In order to minimize future conflicts, we'll wait for #15539 to be integrated. Then, we'll base [JDK-8345139](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345139 "Fix bugs and inconsistencies in the Provider services map") on HEAD code including it.