RFR: 8340327: A common framework to support public key algorithms with standard parameter sets [v6]

Sean Mullan mullan at openjdk.org
Fri Oct 4 13:12:41 UTC 2024


On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 17:40:22 GMT, Weijun Wang <weijun at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> To prepare for new PQC algorithms like ML-KEM and ML-DSA where there are only named standardized parameter sets, a common framework is introduced.
>> 
>> A example of EdDSA implementation using this framework is included as a test.
>
> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains six additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into 8340327
>  - more test, more RAW support, fix a bug on cleaning up getRawBytes output
>  - add support for private class RawKeySpec
>  - ensure key is intact after being used
>  - renames
>  - the fix

src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/provider/NamedKeyPairGenerator.java line 81:

> 79:     private final String[] pnames; // allowed parameter set name (at least one)
> 80: 
> 81:     protected String name = null; // init as

Nit, don't need to set it to null.

src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/provider/NamedKeyPairGenerator.java line 117:

> 115:                     "Unknown AlgorithmParameterSpec: " + params);
> 116:         }
> 117:         this.secureRandom = random ;

Nit, extra space before ;

src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/provider/NamedKeyPairGenerator.java line 123:

> 121:     public void initialize(int keysize, SecureRandom random) {
> 122:         if (keysize != -1) {
> 123:             // Bonus: a chance to provide a SecureRandom without

Is this a TODO because I don't see the code that does this? I would avoid the word "Bonus" here.

src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/provider/NamedKeyPairGenerator.java line 144:

> 142:     /// @return public key and private key (in this order) in raw bytes
> 143:     /// @throws ProviderException if there is an internal error
> 144:     public abstract byte[][] implGenerateKeyPair(String pname, SecureRandom sr);

Should be protected?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21167#discussion_r1787683989
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21167#discussion_r1787692380
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21167#discussion_r1787689743
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21167#discussion_r1787694991


More information about the security-dev mailing list