RFR: 8347067: Load certificates without explicit trust settings in KeyChainStore

[Alexey Bakhtin]

On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 17:01:10 GMT, Tim Jacomb <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> ## The change
>> 
>> Without this change intermediate certificates that don't have explicit trust settings are ignored not added to the truststore.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ## Reproducer
>> 
>> See https://github.com/timja/openjdk-intermediate-ca-reproducer
>> 
>> Without this change the reproducer fails, and with this change it succeeds.
>> 
>> ## Example failing architecture
>> 
>> Root CA -> Intermediate 1 -> Intermediate 2 -> Leaf
>> 
>> Where:
>> * All certs are in admin domain kSecTrustSettingsDomainAdmin
>> * Root CA is marked as always trust
>> * Intermediate 1 and 2 are Unspecified
>> 
>> Previously Root CA would be found but intermediate 1 and 2 would be skipped when verifying trust settings.
>> 
>> ## Background reading
>> 
>> ### Rust
>> see also Rust Lib that is used throughout Rust ecosystem for this: 
>> https://github.com/rustls/rustls-native-certs/blob/efe7b1d77bf6080851486535664d1dc7ef0dea68/src/macos.rs#L39-L58
>> 
>> e.g. in Deno `https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/11491` where I've verified it is correctly implemented and works in my setup
>> 
>> ## Python
>> 
>> I also looked at the Python implementation for inspiration as well (which also works on my system): https://github.com/sethmlarson/truststore/blob/main/src/truststore/_macos.py
>
> test/jdk/java/security/KeyStore/CheckMacOSKeyChainIntermediateCATrust.java line 43:
> 
>> 41: 
>> 42: /*
>> 43:  * @test
> 
> @alexeybakhtin quick question on how this should be marked as manual.
> 
> I see all tests in https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/test/jdk/TEST.groups#L256-L259 are manual ones.
> Is this test automatically included in that?
> 
> Or should it be added here?
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/test/jdk/TEST.groups#L657

The test should be marked as `@run junit/manual ` and added to the `jdk_security_manual_interactive` part of the TEST.groups

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22911#discussion_r1905813515