RFR: 8365072: Refactor tests to use PEM API (Phase 2) [v2]

[Mikhail Yankelevich]

On Fri, 26 Sep 2025 21:47:19 GMT, Anthony Scarpino <ascarpino at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Mikhail Yankelevich has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Francesco's comment
>>   
>>   Co-authored-by: Francesco Andreuzzi <andreuzzi.francesco at gmail.com>
>
> test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/interop/ClientHelloBufferUnderflowException.java line 33:
> 
>> 31:  * @bug 8215790 8219389
>> 32:  * @summary Verify exception
>> 33:  * @enablePreview
> 
> There doesn't look to be any PEM usage in this test

This class extends `ClientHelloInterOp`, so needs an updated tag.

> test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/interop/ClientHelloChromeInterOp.java line 33:
> 
>> 31:  * @bug 8169362
>> 32:  * @summary Interop automated testing with Chrome
>> 33:  * @enablePreview
> 
> Appears not to need PEM

This class extends `ClientHelloInterOp`, so needs an updated tag.

> test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/interop/ClientHelloInterOp.java line 296:
> 
>> 294: 
>> 295:                 // generate the private key.
>> 296:                 String keyMaterialStrPEMFormat = new PEMRecord("PRIVATE KEY", keyMaterialKeys[i]).toString();
> 
> Should this one be done with [JDK-8367326](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8367326) instead of this PR?

Yes, you're right, I must have missed this one when removing `PEMRecord` classes from this PR. I'll change it to not use PEMRecord or move it to JDK-8367326

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27194#discussion_r2387342488
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27194#discussion_r2387342957
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27194#discussion_r2387348814